beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim that the court changed in exchange is dismissed.
2. The Plaintiff’s total costs of litigation.
Reasons
1. Grounds for this part of the basic facts are stated by the court of first instance.
1. Since the facts of recognition are the same as the entries in the part of the facts of recognition (as of No. 2, No. 12, No. 4), they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The plaintiff's assertion asserts that the defendant, separate from the permission for development and land category change of the land category of the E forest in the Gyeongbuk-gun, the plaintiff is obligated to take the procedure for ownership transfer registration for 138/1289 square meters out of the 1289 square meters of the E forest in the Gyeongbuk-gun and the agreement, and at the same time, the plaintiff is obligated to take the procedure for ownership transfer registration for 138/1794 square meters of the land in the 1794 square meters of the
3. The Plaintiff and the Defendant, through the instant sales contract and agreement, changed the land category E in the Gyeongbuk-gun, the Plaintiff owned by the Plaintiff from “forest” to “head,” and instead, transferred the ownership of the land divided by 138 square meters out of the above land to the Defendant, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to divide the instant land into the entire land and transfer the ownership of the instant land to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to transfer the ownership of the instant land to the Plaintiff through the instant sales contract and agreement, and it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to transfer the ownership of the instant land to the Plaintiff in order to separate ownership of the said land from the said land. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit without further review
4. The plaintiff's claim that the court changed the exchange in this court is without merit, and it is so dismissed as per Disposition.
At the same time, the Daegu District Court received KRW 431,00,000 from the plaintiff due to the invalidation of the sales contract on March 2, 2010 or the cancellation of the above sales contract due to the defendant's default, and completed the registration of the senior branch branch of the Daegu District Court No. 1955 on March 11, 2010.