1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. On October 28, 201, while serving as an employee of the subsidiary metal company (hereinafter “instant workplace”), the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “a closed frame of the bones, closed fluoral bones, neute dyke, neute of neute, neute of neute, nephal neute, neute, neute, neutronum, and neutrone” (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”), and was provided medical care until September 17, 2012.

In the process, the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service, a medical institution for industrial accident insurance, the Plaintiff was receiving medical treatment, prepared a treatment plan covering the scheduled period for treatment from August 18, 2012 to September 17, 2012, and submitted it to the Defendant. On August 24, 2012, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff should approve the treatment plan submitted by the Plaintiff, as it is, and that the period for medical treatment from August 18, 2012 to September 17, 2012.

(hereinafter “The first notification”). After that, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care with the Defendant, and subsequently received additional medical care for the instant injury and disease from February 17, 2013 to January 9, 2014, following the Defendant’s non-approval disposition and the revocation decision in the petition for review.

In the process, the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service established a medical treatment plan with the scheduled treatment period from December 10, 2013 to January 9, 2014 in the Changwon Industrial Complex, and submitted it to the Defendant on December 9, 2013. The Defendant notified the Plaintiff on December 9, 2013 that the Plaintiff’s medical treatment plan submitted by the Plaintiff should be approved as it is and the period from December 10, 2013 to January 9, 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as “the second notification of this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] / [The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination as to the legitimacy of the instant lawsuit

A. The defendant filed a claim against the plaintiff, and the first notification of this case was made by the first notification of this case, and the first notification was made.