logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.06.16 2013고단613
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 13, 200, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Busan District Court on August 24, 2001, a fine of one million won for the same crime at the Seoul Northern District Court on December 26, 2008, a fine of one million won for the same crime at the Suwon District Court on August 26, 2008, a fine of two million won for the same crime at the same court on August 28, 2009, and two years for a suspended sentence of six months for the same crime at the Busan District Court on October 14, 2009, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime at the Ulsan District Court on September 6, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

On December 17, 2012, the Defendant driven D1 ton cargo at a section of about 16 km from the front of the street to the front of the entrance of the gold-sports park located in the Nowon-gu in Busan, Simpo-dong without obtaining a driver's license on December 17, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the register of driver's licenses and the register of tea;

1. Relevant Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is committed during the period of suspension of execution due to drinking, driving without a license, etc., and thus, the nature of the crime of this case is not good. However, the crime of this case is simply a driver without a license, the defendant is detained for at least two months, and his mistake is against himself, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment are considered in the arguments of this case, and the punishment is imposed as ordered.

arrow