The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is the 17 years of age and 11 months of age as indicated in the judgment of the court below, which was the time of adult majority under the Juvenile Protection Act, and there was no circumstance to suspect that the defendant was a juvenile. The defendant's business place was a restaurant that sells a large volume of alcoholic beverages to family members and tourists. Thus, the defendant has no reason to sell alcoholic beverages to juveniles.

Therefore, the defendant did not have the intention to sell liquor to juveniles.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, namely, ① although E had a physical size of 7 km in the height of 182 cm, it appears that it still remains for 19 years and 4 months at the time of testimony at the court of first instance. At the time of this case, it was difficult for E’s appearance to be perceived as a juvenile as the defendant before 1 year and 6 months prior to the time of testimony, and ② unlike the clothes when E wear a uniform, it was difficult to view that E was a juvenile, unlike the clothes when E wears a uniform, the Defendant was not deemed to be an adult, and the Defendant could not be deemed to have been aware of the physical size of E’s clothes at the time of signing the 182 cm, ③ the Defendant could not be deemed to have been aware of the physical size of E’s clothes, and the Defendant could not be deemed to have been aware or to have been aware of the order of E’s drinking, and ③ the Defendant could not be aware of the order of E’s drinking and drinking.