A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

From May 12, 201 to July 13, 2012, a total of KRW 11,000,000, five times.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On April 14, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for embezzlement at the Changwon District Court on October 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 22, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On October 29, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C by phone calls at an insular place to the victim C, stating, “The Defendant shall pay the payment of the construction cost to the victim, as he/she borrowed one million won as he/she has short of money for the interior business, and as he/she ends the construction work within one month.”

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the above money to the victim with the construction cost.

The defendant obtained the delivery of KRW 1 million from the national bank account (Account Number: D) in the name of the defendant on the day from the victim.

2. On December 12, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant is constructing a G hotel underground performance hall in the vicinity of the F office operated by the Defendant located in Changwon-si, the Defendant would complete the G hotel construction and complete the construction work and complete the payment upon receiving the construction cost.”

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the above money to the victim with the payment of construction work.

The defendant received 8.6 million won on the day from the victim's seat in cash, and obtained 8.6 million won on the day as the above national bank account in the name of the defendant and obtained 10 million won in total.

3. On January 28, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay monthly rent of KRW 10,000,000,000,000 to another place after deducting the F Office” to the victim in the vicinity of Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and that the Defendant would have repaid the borrowed deposit with the proceeds accrued while performing the construction, and would have paid the books and classical expenses to be used at the office.”

However, the facts are that the monthly income is borne by the Corporation at its cost.