1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was born in the Republic of Korea as a child B (B), mother, and C (C and father) who is a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Austria (hereinafter referred to as Naria).

B. On May 4, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant. On June 7, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition for refugee status acceptance (hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a well-founded fear that is likely to suffer persecution” under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as the “Refugee”) and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter referred to as the “Refugee Protocol”).

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on June 13, 2016, but was dismissed on the same ground as on December 22, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence No. 3-1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Plaintiff’s mother, who applied for refugee, is a child born in the Republic of Korea and the Plaintiff should be recognized as a refugee on the grounds of family-combined principle

B. In addition to the whole purport of the pleadings, the following facts may be acknowledged in each entry in Section B’s Nos. 4 to 7:

① On November 18, 2015, the Plaintiff’s mother B filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on the ground that he/she rejected traditional religious sublime’s worship by entering into a class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class of the class

The plaintiff's mother filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 3, 2016, but was dismissed on June 30, 2016.

② On March 11, 2015, the Plaintiff’s denial C is a threat to the members of the Oral Committee.