Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 9, 2015, at the office of “E real estate” operated by the victim D in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 14:50, 2015, the injured Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, by hand, on the ground that the real estate sales contract that the victim’s request for brokerage was not sexually dead, the victim’s head debt was collected by hand, the victim’s face was collected by hand, the victim’s face was collected by her hand, and the victim was cut back to her floor by her hand, the victim’s neck was cut down from the victim’s back to her floor, the victim’s bridge was walked once, and the victim’s chest was taken by drinking.

2. The Defendant damaged property by destroying the victim’s cell phone at the time and at the place of paragraph 1, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s cell phone so that the victim’s cell phone was stored on the floor in the victim’s cell phone and damaged the liquid situation by destroying the victim’s cell phone so that it can be repaired.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The victim's upper part and the damaged mobile phone photograph, and the part above the victim's upper part and the damaged mobile phone photograph;

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal investigation reports (criminal suspect's criminal scene pictures and CD attachment), CD (hereinafter referred to as the said video files), and printing pages for criminal suspects;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not commit any harm to the victim by assaulting the victim as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the defendant, and there was no fact that the victim's cell phone was damaged.