1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. In full view of the overall purport of arguments and arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including the number of branch offices; hereinafter the same shall apply) of the defendant's duty to deliver the building, the plaintiff was awarded a successful bid in the voluntary auction procedure for the 307 neighborhood living facilities of the 35th floor located in Ansan-si Ha (hereinafter "the aggregate building of this case") in Ansan-si (hereinafter "the aggregate building of this case") and completed the registration of transfer of ownership on September 27, 2012. The defendant occupied the store of this case unrelated to the above issue even after completion of the electricity and lighting work of the 5th floor PC among the aggregate building of this case (the defendant is only the possession assistant who occupies and manages the store of this case as the general secretary of the above claim division with delegation from C's claim for construction cost, but there is no lack of evidence to acknowledge each of the above arguments, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it).

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to deliver the above store to the plaintiff, the owner of the instant store, except in extenuating circumstances.

2. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s assertion on the instant aggregate building is a indirect possessor who directly occupies the Defendant, and has the right of retention as to the instant store, and that the Defendant is in a position to invoke the said right of retention as a direct possessor, and thus, it cannot comply with the Plaintiff’s claim.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 19, and 22 of this case, the construction business operator of this case is deemed to have completed fire-fighting and construction works, stone construction works, gypt construction works, and glass construction with respect to the aggregate building of this case, but has not received the construction cost, and further, the construction business operator of this case is deemed to have