A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment in the Daejeon District Court due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection of Victims (a minor, rape, etc. under thirteen years of age) and completed the execution of the sentence in a public prison on December 20, 201.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those who are engaged in driving motor vehicles in C options.

On March 8, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car on March 23:15, 2013, and continued to drive the two-lane road above the straightway, which is located in the new vibration of the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, along the two-lanes from the east to the new coal basin.

At the same time, the two-lanes of road are two-lanes, so if the vehicle is changed, there was a duty of care to operate direction direction etc. and give notice of change of course and change of the vehicle line as well as the situation of traffic before and after the moving.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through two-lanes on the right side by changing the vehicle line into the right side as it is, and received the front wheel part of the vehicle driving by the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 29 years of age) which was driven by the victim D (the 29 years of age).

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to light salt, etc. that requires medical treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s car and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim by stopping the car immediately, even if it damages the repair cost to the extent equivalent to KRW 59,406.

2. Although the Defendant is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road, which is not covered by mandatory insurance for violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Defendant operated a motor vehicle to be operated by the Defendant’s owner of the vehicle without mandatory insurance at the date and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.