beta
Text
All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
Basic Facts
A. According to the land survey division and the plaintiffs' inheritance relation 1) The land survey division of the Japanese occupation point period stated that "K, which has a domicile in the J, was under the circumstance of 1,051 square meters in the long- group Lies 1,051. 2) The above long- group Lies 1,051 square meters in the name of the administrative district, land category change, and area conversion, was the land listed in the attached Table (hereinafter "the land in this case").
3) The plaintiffs' fleet "M" (M) died on October 22, 1932 and succeeded to N alone, and N inherited the property on September 19, 200, and the children of the plaintiffs A, B, and C who died on September 19, 200 and were succeeded to 1/12 shares in N's own O (M's death on October 2, 1981) as joint inheritance by the plaintiffs D, E, and F, respectively. Meanwhile, N's multiple copies, the head of N, the south of the fleet M, are written in N, the head of N, U.S. M, as they were born in N. V. M.
B. The instant land cadastre 1) was located in the water welfare zone north of 38 degrees North latitude, and there was no registration of the owner in the land cadastre and other ownership records except the above land survey register by 190 degrees. 2) As to the instant land, P on February 5, 1990, filed an application for the registration of the landowner’s restoration under Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Measures for the Restoration and Preservation Registration, etc. of Unclaimed Land in the Waterside Area (hereinafter “Water Welfare Special Assistance Act”) with the Examination Committee on February 5, 1990. The said application is accompanied by a guarantee attached by the guarantor, AA, and X stating that “I currently own the instant land by inheritance from AB to the date of July 8, 1947.”
3. The member in charge of the review committee of this case has investigated the particulars of the preparation of the above letter of guarantee, and confirmed on December 27, 1989 that P succeeded to the land of this case from AB, and attached to the application form.