All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the following circumstances as to the accused case and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “defendant”), the age, conduct, intelligence, and environment of the victim, the relationship with the victim, the motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the determination of the sentence of the lower court that upheld the first instance judgment that sentenced 12 years to imprisonment with prison labor, even if considering the circumstances asserted by the public defender, is extremely unfair.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence in relation to the claim for attachment order, the lower court is justifiable to have ordered the Defendant to attach an electronic tracking device for 10 years, on the basis of the lower court’s finding of conviction on the charge of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a minor under the age of 13), the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a quasi-Indecent Act in relation to relatives), the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concern

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.