logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.11.13 2019나944
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant who ordered payment in excess of the amount ordered below.

Reasons

1. In the event that the Defendant, on March 4, 2016, inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant injury”) on the part of the Plaintiff, as well as the female employees and the Plaintiff, on the part of the Plaintiff, by drinking alcohol, and drinking alcohol, and drinking alcohol, twice at the right side of the Plaintiff due to the Defendant’s occurrence of rain, and drinking alcohol, etc., two times at the right side of the Plaintiff, etc., for about three weeks of medical treatment (hereinafter “instant injury”). There is no dispute between the parties.

According to the above facts, the defendant, who is the perpetrator of the injury case of this case, is liable for all damages suffered by the plaintiff, who is the victim.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. In full view of the respective descriptions and arguments of the evidence Nos. 4 and 5 (including paper numbers) as to the property affirmative damage A, the Plaintiff is recognized to have spent KRW 1,938,460 as medical expenses due to the instant injury, and thus, the Plaintiff’s active property damage is KRW 1,938,460.

B. In full view of all circumstances, such as the developments leading up to the instant injury case, the personal relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the amount of damages suffered by the Plaintiff, the treatment process of the injury, the degree of anticipated recovery from treatment in the future, criminal cases against the Defendant, and the circumstances after the instant injury, etc., it is reasonable to view that mental damage (defensive materials) suffered by the Plaintiff due to the instant injury as KRW 3,00,000.

C. At the time of the Defendant’s argument as to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant, who was drunk at the time of the Defendant’s argument, was aware that the Plaintiff had been engaged in the same kind of female employees, committed the above injury to the Plaintiff on a contingent basis, and thereafter, was killed and tried to use the Plaintiff in an advanced manner. In light of these circumstances, the Defendant’s liability should be reduced by taking into account the negligence on the part of the Plaintiff, and all other circumstances.

Accordingly, the defendant deposited KRW 1,500,000 as the compensation for the injury of this case for the plaintiff.

arrow