A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 8, 2017, around 08:00, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by inserting the defluences and masts into the market price, which is the victim’s ownership, on the ground that the victim D was snicked in the strings of strings, strings, strings, and heat strings, etc., which are influentd by inserting the defluences and masts.

2. On August 8, 2017, at around 08:15, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the Defendant’s residence located in the building No. 401, and was asked questions about personal information, etc. from the police officer F of the police box where the police box for interested parties was sent to the scene after receiving a report on the damage of property, and was asked by the police officer F of the police box where he was sent to the scene, and the said F tried to confirm the Defendant’s personal information against the Defendant instead of the Defendant who was under influence of alcohol, and assaulted the Defendant’s own above F’s right side side of the above F on a one-time basis.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the third public trial date);

1. Application of the law on police statements made to D, G, H, and F;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 366 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment (the circumstances of a crime, the means and mode of an act, the attitude of an act, the fact that the police officer called out after receiving a report has committed violence to the police officer who has been called out for the crime and has obstructed the legitimate performance of duties by exercising violence, and other consideration

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., the fact that all the charges of this case are recognized late, the fact that the victim of the damage to property and the victim of the damage agreed smoothly, and the fact that there exists no history of punishment exceeding the fine for the last five years);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for protection observation;