logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.09 2017고정2229
방위사업법위반등
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the corporation with the purpose of export and import business, etc. located in E in Ansan, and Defendant B is the representative director of the corporation C, and Defendant A is the F in charge of overseas export and import of military strategic materials of C.

Any person who intends to export strategic materials designated and publicly notified by the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy as goods that require restrictions on export permission, etc. for the purposes of maintaining international peace and security and national security in accordance with the principles of a multilateral international export control system shall obtain export permission from the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy or the head of a related administrative agency, and where he/she intends to export industrial materials and national defense science and technology overseas or to intermediate such transactions, he/she shall obtain permission from the

A. On April 18, 2016, at the office of C Co., Ltd., the Defendant Company A conspired with the competent authority to exhibit the G, model name, H 1 unit to “I” held in Paris of France from June 13, 2016 to June 17, 2013. Defendant B received the said plan from the Defendant Company A, and subsequently approved the plan, and the Defendants exported the said G 1 unit to Paris at the Busan city located in the central office of Busan, Jung-gu, Busan, on April 18, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to export military strategic materials without obtaining permission from the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy, and exported defensive materials without obtaining permission from the head of the Defense Acquisition Program.

B. Defendant C Co., Ltd., at the time and place specified in the above paragraph A, stated in the indictment above B, the representative of the Defendant, and the indictment above A, the Defendant’s employees, as “J” but is obvious that it is a clerical error in the “A”.

(a) As described in this paragraph.

arrow