logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.09.04 2014고정988
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a scar.

1. On November 18, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, driving the said vehicle at a speed of 09:0,00, and driving the road in front of the agricultural branch of the Namnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seoul Metropolitan City, to the side of the Jin apartment apartment at a speed of two lanes.

Since its location is an intersection with a crosswalk, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a cross-section or a signal waiting vehicle by reducing speed and by properly examining the front left left, and to safely drive the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got off the right part of the D Costex vehicle operated by the victim C (the 45 years of age, the nife) who is waiting to turn to the left at the front of the left part of the Defendant’s vehicle due to his occupational negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, sustained injury to the victim C, such as brain salvine in detail, which requires treatment for about three weeks, and suffered injury to the victim E (39 years of age, female) who was accompanied by the above damaged vehicle, such as dynasium, tension, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the said vehicle without mandatory insurance in the state of alcohol content 0.132% while under the influence of alcohol while driving the said vehicle from before the place of the accident described in the above paragraph 1. to the place of the accident described in the above paragraph 1.

3. The Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act: (a) purchased and operated the foregoing vehicle, which is the so-called “large-type vehicle”; and (b) did not apply for the registration of ownership transfer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a actual investigation report on a traffic accident;

1. A report on detection of an employee and an employee;

arrow