A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2017, at around 10:50, the Defendant operated B truck on the road near the winter distance in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu. On September 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) away gravel on which the Defendant loaded the said truck on the front of the cab operated by the victim C; (b) was demanded from the injured party for compensation in front of the same Gu; and (c) the victim demanded from the injured party for compensation when using the match in front of the same Gu; and (d) the victim’s demand from the injured party that “if any gold would have been caused or damaged, then he would inflict an injury on the victim at that time”; (c) the Defendant demanded from the injured party that “if there is any demand from the injured party to take the above measures,” the Defendant carried the hick (40cm length: 40cm) which is a dangerous object on the top of the truck of the said truck, thereby damaging the front of the said taxi owned by the victim, thereby damaging the property of the injured party to the extent of repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 369 of the Criminal Act, Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, reasons for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment, and reasons for sentencing;

1. The basic area (from August to June) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended punishment] the basic area (from January to June) of the types of habitual, repeated crime and special damage (Habitual, repeated crime, special damage, etc.) shall not be included in the sentencing guidelines (the person subject to special sentencing];

2. Based on the above sentencing criteria, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in full view of the following factors, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, and motive of crime:

A normal defendant who is disadvantageous to a favorable normal confession has taken gold in a tea glass, and caused damage to the victim who demanded compensation, thereby throwing away the glass, and added the tea glass to the decline.

It is not very good that the motive or the nature of the crime is very good, and it is not always visible to reflect.

In particular, on August 23, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the Ulsan District Court on August 23, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 3, 2017 and is still under probation period.