beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the first instance court's explanation concerning this case is that "the plaintiff who has been awarded a contract for the tegrative construction work involving "2. The argument and determination of "2." in Part 2, Part 18, Part 2, Part 18, Part 4, part 12, and part 13, and part 4, part 12, and part 13, " never performed a test work for "C in the department store," which is the defendant's franchise store," and part 5, part 8 and 9, "the plaintiff who has been awarded a contract for the tegrative construction work involving the tegrative construction work involving "the plaintiff who has been awarded a contract for the tegrative construction work involving Fegrgroid," and part 15 and 16 of the first instance judgment "the plaintiff has been asserting that "the plaintiff had been performing the construction work of the same tegrative franchise's other franchise's tegrative construction work involving "the plaintiff's 3."
2. A and B are the same as the grounds of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of paragraphs (a) and (b), and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420
2. Additional matters to be determined;
A. Even if the Plaintiff’s assertion design services and additional design services are not acknowledged to be a verbal agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Defendant granted the Plaintiff a legitimate expectation or trust to the effect that the interior contract would be concluded in a clear manner in accordance with the design services contract or design services, and accordingly, the Plaintiff supplied the design drawings to the Defendant.
Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to conclude the interior construction contract with the Plaintiff according to the design service contract or design service. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered damages of KRW 50,600,000 and the additional design service cost of KRW 27,500,000.