1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Upon the defendant's request, the plaintiff asserts that he/she supplied home appliances, etc. to D High Schools, E Museum, Freching Place, etc., and that he/she did not receive 22,350,000 won as of November 24, 2013.

The plaintiff's statement in Gap evidence No. 1 (written claim) submitted by the plaintiff is difficult to believe that the plaintiff recognized that the original defendant's name was changed to "B" before the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case. The statement in Gap evidence No. 1 (written claim) before the correction is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed due to the lack of reason. Since the judgment of the court of first instance with different conclusions is unfair, it is revoked and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.