logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2016.12.27 2016나11241
소유권이전등기말소등기 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s appeal and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)’s appeal are dismissed, respectively.

2. The appeal costs.

Reasons

1. As the cited judgment of the court of first instance does not significantly differ from the contents asserted by the plaintiffs and the defendants in the trial of the court of first instance. The evidence submitted by the court of first instance and the evidence submitted by the court of first instance are all dismissed, and the part of the plaintiffs' claim for ownership transfer registration is accepted in the counterclaim of the court of first instance, and the remaining part of the counterclaim is dismissed. The judgment of the court of first instance that dismissed the remainder of the counterclaim is reasonable.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are dismissed as they are without merit, and they are justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder of the counter-claims shall be dismissed as they are without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified in conclusion, and all appeals filed by the plaintiffs and defendant E-friendly council are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow