A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) transferred his/her physical card to an employee of Bophishing, and was aware of the fact that the account linked to the above physical card was used for the crime of Bophishing and received the relevant investigation as a criminal suspect in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act; (b) on April 18, 2018 and June 14, 2018, the Defendant was issued a disposition of suspension of indictment; and (c) on April 11, 2019, the Defendant transferred the physical card with a proposal that he/she would provide loans from his/her name-free persons; and (d) on April 12, 2019, the following day after the transfer of the physical card.

On April 24, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal from a person under whose name the name was the “BA Team leader of the Company C” of the Company C, to make a loan by creating the details of monthly payment as if he were the employees of the Company B. After accepting the proposal to the effect that the Defendant “on deposit the Company’s money into the account, to withdraw and deliver the said money to the employees,” and then, notified the person under whose name the Defendant was named, of the number of post offices account numbers (D) in the name of the Defendant.

However, as seen above, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was an employee of Bohishing in the process of having received a relevant investigation as a suspect for violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and having received a disposition of suspension of indictment.

On April 24, 2019, the above false statement that the victim E made a loan to the victim E by telephone, stating, “The Government grants a loan with high interest rate. When using high interest loans, it is possible to grant a loan to the Government. It is possible to do so.” It received 5,500,000 won from the victim to the above post office account in the name of the defendant at least twice in the name of the defendant, and the defendant delivered money to the above person under the name of the victim through the F, "the employee of the company in the atmosphere of the bank."

This is the defendant.