The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the instant facts charged was prepared by C with the intent of having C receive criminal punishment.

The details and facts of "A, the complainant, entered the name of the complainant in his/her own free contract in the building lease contract of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of

Nevertheless, around December 3, 2014, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the Ulsan District Public Prosecutor's Office to the public prosecutor's office and filed the complaint with C.

2. On September 25, 1996, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, ① the defendant’s resident registration number back is not indicated in the contract (Evidence No. 77, 122 pages, hereinafter “first contract”) which was alleged to be forged by C at the time when the defendant made a complaint. It is difficult to easily understand that C, including the contract claiming to be a provisional contract, did not state only the back of the resident registration number in all relevant contracts, and ② there is no seal or signature of the defendant in the first contract, ② there is no seal or signature of the defendant; ② in the investigative agency, the defendant stated to the effect that “A was written on the back of the resident registration number and the seal affixed thereon.”

It is difficult to understand that the Defendant did not sign, affix, or affix a seal on the page on which the contract was written, and that it was difficult for C to understand that the other contract (Evidence No. 31, 127 pages of evidence, hereinafter “second contract”) made on September 25, 1996 was written in 192 or in 194, and the date of preparation, contract term, etc. was written in 192 or in 1994, but the Defendant arbitrarily collected official disturbance, but the second contract was written in 19.