1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and the reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding, adding, and changing part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, they are cited in accordance with

2. On April 6, 2015, the part of the first instance court's order to dismiss, add, or change the case is "as of April 6, 2014" and the "as of April 6, 2015" in the third part of the third part of the first instance court's decision is "as of April 2015," respectively.

The following shall be added to the fourth sentence of the first instance court:

C. The limitation of liability is, on the other hand, the following circumstances acknowledged by adding the overall purport of pleadings to Gap evidence Nos. 9, 20, Eul evidence Nos. 7, 8, and 9 to the testimony of witness C of the first instance trial (including the provisional parcel number circulation for those with virtual numbers) and some of the testimony of witness C of the first instance trial, namely, ① the defendant's negligence did not install a solar heat charging system serving as an assistant to supply electricity to the leisure pumps, but the fact that the machine was discharged up to the machine board is attributable to the plaintiff's negligence. ② There was a systematic management contract between the plaintiff and the defendant on the leisure boat of this case. However, there was a systematic management contract between the plaintiff and the defendant on specific management items or remuneration, ③ The plaintiff did not set the specific management items or remuneration amount, ③ the defendant's negligence on the occurrence of the accident of this case, which falls under the nationwide funeral, and ④ it was difficult to readily conclude that the plaintiff did not deliver the plaintiff's duty of care to the defendant for six months or more.