A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2, 2016, the Defendant was driving a vehicle D 130% under the influence of alcohol level 0.210% in a section of about 7km from the front of a mutual influence restaurant located in the Dong-ri to the front of a restaurant located in the Gamsan-si, Gyeongsan-si, if the Defendant was a Si Gyeongsan-si on April 2, 2016.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle D i30.

On April 2, 2016, around 23:28, the Defendant driven the said car on the front of the C cafeteria located in the Busan Metropolitan City, Gyeonggi-do, and proceeded at a speed of about 50 to 60km per hour among the two-lane roads in the city of Gyeongsan in the city of Gyeongsan.

At the time, there is a place where the center line of the yellow-ray is installed at night, and there is a cub car in the opposite part in the F of the victim E (44 ) driving, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to look at the front left and right well, and to proceed with it at a safe speed and in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, as in the above paragraph 1, the defendant was negligent in driving the center line due to the negligence of neglecting it as in the above paragraph 1, and the defendant did not avoid the above-mentioned vehicle that was driven by the person located on the surface of the air at the time of the scoo in the scoo line. The part of the motor vehicle operated by the defendant is the front part of the motor vehicle operated by the defendant and received the front part of the coos vehicle above. Since the motor vehicle of the defendant continued to be pushed by the shock, the vehicle of the defendant continued to be pushed by the coos in the front part of the coos in the above road, and as the vehicle of the above road was pushed by the coos of the victim G (the 45 years old) which was driven along the two-lane road at the time of the scoos of the above road, it did not avoid the H learning motor vehicle of the victim G (the 45-lane motor vehicle).

In conclusion, the defendant has violated two cages that require approximately four weeks of treatment to victims E due to the above occupational negligence.