1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: the real estate listed in Section 1 of [Attachment];

B. Defendant C shall set out in attached list 2.

1. There is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim, or comprehensively taking account of the purport of each statement in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the plaintiff is the Housing Redevelopment and Development Project Association approved on October 4, 2010 by designating the project implementation district of 129,323 square meters (including real estate recorded in the attached list, and area size shall be changed to 129,599 square meters) of H Day in Michuhol-gu, Incheon as the project implementation district, and the plaintiff is subject to the approval of the management and disposal plan from the head of Michuhol-gu, Incheon (the head of Michuhol-gu, Incheon) on June 19, 2017, the head of Michuhol-gu, Incheon as the owner of each real estate listed in the attached list that did not apply for parcelling-gu,

According to the above facts, the plaintiff is a project implementer who has received public notice of approval of a management and disposal plan pursuant to the provisions related to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter "Urban Improvement Act"), and the defendants are the owners of each real estate listed in the attached list in the project area, and the defendants are obligated to deliver each of

2. The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff did not perform the obligation to compensate for losses under the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”).

The plaintiff's deposit of compensation for losses due to the judgment of the local Land Tribunal of Incheon Metropolitan City can be recognized in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement Nos. 10 and 11, and there is no dispute between the parties, or considering the purport of the whole pleadings, this part of the defendants' assertion

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is with merit, and all of them are accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

However, even if the plaintiff is sufficiently expected to claim the compensation of the damages on the part of the defendants, the plaintiff is in accordance with adjudication.