1. The Defendant’s KRW 482,90,000 among the Plaintiff and KRW 48,290,000 among them, shall be KRW 434,610,000 from September 21, 201.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company that produces and sells chemical materials used in the field of electrical and electronic industry, reinforcement glass for the tamp panel, etc., and the Defendant is a company that produces and sells LED names, numerical control (hereinafter referred to as “CNC”) processing apparatus by computer, rabr processing apparatus, etc. 2) The Plaintiff is to jointly promote the manufacture of manufacture facilities necessary for processing the glass attached to the front part of the mobile phone (hereinafter referred to as “buphone”) by jointly promoting the company in favor of the Plaintiff, the company in favor of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “in favor of the Plaintiff”), and the manufacture facilities necessary for processing the glass attached to the cell phone (i.e., the mobile phone). The Plaintiff had the winning party take charge of the manufacture of the CNC processing apparatus necessary for the above glass processing.

3) The personnel A et al. in favor of the Defendant are the foundation that establishes a glass, seeking the purchase of the CNC processing machine, and the FA-700GS 1, a CNC processing machine from the Defendant.

hereinafter referred to as “first product of this case”

(ii) 2 FA-750G units (which are equipment forming the Foundation’s glass);

hereinafter referred to as “second product of this case”

(ii) 3 GI, FA-752GI (which is equipment for the fluence of the goods of the Foundation).

hereinafter referred to as “third product of this case”

(4) From March 24, 2011 to July 5, 2011, the Defendant produced sample samples to the employees of the winning company for the purpose of free processing using each of the instant products at least 18 times. The Defendant provided the Plaintiff with the explanatory materials for the instant products (Evidence A No. 4) and the carbag (Evidence A6) containing the introduction of each of the instant products through substitute winning.

After the conclusion of the sales contract, the Defendant also provided the Plaintiff with the mechanical inspection report (No. 2) for each of the instant products.

B. On August 30, 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to purchase each of the instant products from the Defendant in total at KRW 482,90,000 (including value-added tax) as follows (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).