1. The Defendants: (a) KRW 8,221,492 for each Plaintiff; (b) 5% per annum from January 16, 2016 to June 2, 2016; and (c).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and Defendant C are students of E Middle School in the field of strike, and Defendant D are referred to Defendant C.

B. On September 5, 2014, Defendant C was working for the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff was playing his/her own in the class of the second grade class and the first grade class of the above middle school, and there was an accident involving three (3) the Plaintiff’s dental services.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2 through 5, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Where a minor who has caused damage is liable for tort on his/her own due to the ability to compensate, if there is a proximate causal relation with the minor’s breach of duty by the supervisor, the supervisor is liable for damages as a general tortfeasor.

(See Supreme Court Decision 93Da60588 delivered on August 23, 1994). According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant C had the ability to change the responsibility of the act as a middle student at the time of the above act.

However, in addition to the purport of the whole argument in the above evidence, the defendant C is economically dependent on the defendant D, who is his father, and is under the protection and supervision of the defendant D, and the defendant D bears the duty to protect and supervise the defendant C, who is a minor, by means of ordinary guidance and advice, so that it does not commit a tort, but is negligent in such supervisory duty so that the above accident occurred.

Therefore, Defendant C is a tort, and Defendant D is liable for damages incurred to the Plaintiff due to each of the illegal acts committed by each of the supervisory breach officers.

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. Written treatment costs of KRW 1,832,50 (the Defendant’s attorney stated that KRW 1,832,500 was recognized at the first date for pleading).

At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff, at the time of the instant accident, provided dental and medical treatment to dental children, and the instant court’s hospitals affiliated to the colleges of Egrative Women’s University.