Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of 15 million won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on March 13, 2014, the Busan District Court sentenced 4 months of imprisonment and 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment, and 8 months of imprisonment for fraud in the same court on February 18, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in Busan District Court on July 25, 2016.

Defendant

B On October 10, 2014, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced 2 years and 6 months to imprisonment for fraud and embezzlement, and on June 10, 2015, the same court sentenced 8 months to imprisonment for fraud, respectively, and completed the execution of the sentence on September 12, 2016 at the Cheongju Women’s Prison.

On January 16, 2017, the Defendants: (a) in the instant officetels No. 513 of the D Building in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul on January 16, 2017, there are 10 cases of the Victim E, “In the instant Seoul, there have been 10 cases of the fast ice pentle pentle in the instant Seoul; and (b) more than 2,400 square meters.

In addition, there is a lack of money in order to keep the pented building as the land owned within the smuggling is added.

In the case of lending money, the interest of three copies per share shall be paid, the principal shall be guaranteed, and the principal and interest shall be repaid within 10 weeks.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not have a panty business but did not have a pention, and the market price in the case of Fpenta in which they attempted to purchase reaches KRW 1.5 billion, but the Defendants did not have any circumstance to pay the down payment of KRW 100 million at the time of the instant case, and there was no clear business profit from the said business, and even if they received the investment money from investors such as the victims, they did not have the ability to rapidly increase the profits within a short period by utilizing the investment money, so the Defendants did not have to take a method to pay the full amount of the investment money or the excess amount to the existing investors in order by using the investment money kept by the investors in the subsequent priority, and have received investments again by inducing reinvestment from the existing investors.