beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Bosing criminal organization, which is managed by the general responsibility in name, is an organization composed of inducements to acquire damage funds by deceiving many unspecified victims by communication, collections of the large account to receive damage money and collections of the check card connected thereto, withdrawals of the damage money deposited into the large account, withdrawals of the damage money deposited into the large account, and deliverys of the check card between collections and withdrawals.
Upon receipt of the instructions from the Defendant, the Defendant received the money from the Defendant’s bank account B (C) in the name of the Defendant, and decided to take charge of withdrawing and remitting the money.
On January 18, 2018, a false statement was made to the effect that, if the existing loans are repaid to the victim D around January 18, 2018, the Defendant was transferred KRW 12 million to the above bank account of the Defendant on January 24, 2018, and then, the Defendant was transferred KRW 37 million in total from three victims, such as the one in the attached Table 1 of the Crimes List 1 on the same day.
On the same day, the Defendant continued to withdraw the above amount of damage from the bank account at the Dong branch of the bank account in Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, B at the Dong branch of the bank account, and then released the total amount of KRW 25 million on two occasions, as shown in attached Table 2, 1, and 2,000,000,000,000, in total, on two occasions, as shown in attached Table 2, 25,000,000,000,000,000 won, as listed in Table 2, 2,000,000 won, was suspended from the transaction and was not withdrawn from the said bank account.
Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving victims in collusion with the employees of phishing operations in collusion.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made with respect to F, G, H, and D;
1. The department related to the report of the 112 case.