The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In light of the following: (a) the gist of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (unfair sentencing) recognizes the error of the defendant; (b) the P, W, AH, AS, AS, and Y, who suffered damage by delivery of forged trading contracts or sales contracts from the defendant, are expected to submit an application for appeal seeking a preference against the defendant; (c) the victim AS in the crime of fraud expressed in the investigative agency that the victim AS has expressed his/her intention to revoke the complaint against the crime of fraud; (d) C has gained substantial pecuniary benefits with the defendant’s development efforts on the part of the defendant; and (e) the defendant has an old age and it is difficult for him/her to cope with life at the bar, the sentence of

Judgment

The crime of this case was committed by the defendant by forging 6 parts of the contract for sale in the name of D, E, or the contract for sale in the name of D without consent from D, E, and by deceiving the victim AS and Y as if he had legitimate authority to prepare the contract for sale in the name of D, and by obtaining 20,000,000 won each from the above victims as contract deposit, and there is a lot of legal disputes between each nominal owner and the other party of the contract for sale and purchase and the contract for sale in the name of each of the above victims due to each of the crimes of this case. The damage and suffering suffered by the parties were not small, the victim of the crime of fraud and the damage suffered by AY were not fully compensated until the above trial. Although P and AH expressed their intent to obstruct the defendant's prior position, the legal disputes arising from the forgery of each of the above contract for sale in the name of D have not been resolved, and the defendant's age, method, circumstance, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and all of its motive and circumstances.