1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. A around 01:05 on June 10, 2013, Defendant A driven C-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-C-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-C-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-C-Wed-Wed

2. At around 01:05 on June 10, 2013, Defendant B driven a DM3 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.136% from the Pool of the Peace City (SM3 vehicle), which was under the influence of alcohol, from around 4km to the intersection of the 3km of the business incubator in front of the business incubator for the advance of the business incubator.

Summary of Evidence

The Defendants’ respective legal statements, and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of each written circumstantial report to the driver [Defendant A]

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 44 (1) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (Consideration of imprisonment: Consideration of the fact that the numerical value of drunk driving is very high and that of the fact that the person has been punished once as a drunk driving in 208, etc.);

2. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

4. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act regarding orders to provide community service and attend lectures [Defendant B]

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the selection of fines: The numerical value of drunk driving, and the one-time punishment for drunk driving, and other consideration shall be taken into account, such as the fact that the person was punished for a fine of one million won in 2005);

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.