logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2020.08.11 2019가합406760
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a stock company with the purpose of cargo transport business, cargo storage business, etc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff company”).

Defendant B is the Plaintiff Company’s founder. (2) From September 29, 1995 to June 15, 201, the Plaintiff Company’s sole representative director, from June 15, 201 to March 6, 2015, joint representative director, from March 6, 2015 to May 30, 2018; Defendant C was the second child of Defendant B, from September 30 to March 29, 201; Defendant C was the internal director from April 11, 201 to March 6, 201 to June 15, 201 to the representative director from June 15, 201 to the representative director from March 30, 201 to the date of May 30, 201 to the date of May 31, 2015; Defendant C was the joint director from March 20, 201 to the date of the Plaintiff’s second child.

3) Defendant E, as an in-house director of the Plaintiff Company from August 17, 201 to January 16, 2013, Defendant B, as an in-house director of the Plaintiff Company, and Defendant F, as Defendant B’s wife, retired from office after having served as an in-house director from September 29, 1995 to November 26, 2014. (B) The total shares issued by the Plaintiff Company were 135,000 shares, and Defendant C, which Defendant B was 37,00 shares, and 37,50 shares, Defendant D, 21,00 shares, G, 11,00 shares, H, 16,50 shares, and 100 shares owned by all of the Plaintiff Company (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

2) On May 25, 2018, I, J, K, and L acquired the entire shares issued upon the conclusion of a share acquisition agreement with all shareholders of the Plaintiff Company, and I was appointed as representative director, J, and K as an internal director, respectively. [The facts that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in subparagraphs 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]

2. The plaintiff company's assertion and judgment on this issue

A. The summary of the Plaintiff Company’s assertion 1, B, C, and D are serving as directors of the Plaintiff Company, and Defendant E and M are actually serving as follows.

arrow