1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. We first examine the Plaintiff’s defense prior to the merits, which states that the Defendant’s subsequent appeal to determine whether the subsequent appeal is lawful, is unlawful.

Article 171-2 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act provides that when a party, his legal representative or his legal representative changes his place of service without delay, the purport thereof shall be reported to the court. Paragraph (2) of the same Article provides that service of documents to a person who fails to make a report under paragraph (1) may be made by registered mail at the place where the previous service is made only when the place where the service is to be made is unknown, and "if the place where service is to be made is unknown" as mentioned above, it is reasonable to say that the service by registered mail may be made only when the other party is ordered to correct his address or it is not necessary to investigate by his own authority the resident registration card, etc., but it is not necessary to order the other

I would like to say.

(2) In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant on November 21, 201, as Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 201Da31592, Sept. 26, 1997; 2001Da31592, Aug. 24, 2001). In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff: (a) filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant on November 21, 2016, as Seoul East Eastern District Court Decision 2016Da67934, Nov. 21, 2016; (b) the Defendant’s domicile was written in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, where the Defendant’s place of delivery was registered as the Defendant’s place of business; (c) the court of first instance served the copy of the instant complaint on December 9, 2016, which was served on the Defendant’s employee as the date for pleading of the first instance court on December 27, 2017.