logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.07 2017가단76501
차용금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. D paid 5% or 7% of the monthly investment attraction to investors to the head of each branch office, the head of each branch office, the head of each group, and the head of each group, according to the investment attraction performance of each branch office in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul E and 23 and 18 branch offices in Seoul. A branch office, the head of each branch office, according to the investment attraction performance of each branch office, shall be the head of each group, and the head of each group, the head of each group, the head of each group, and the head of each group, appointed as the head of each team as the head of each group, and the head of each group.

B. Defendant B, among the above 18 points, was affiliated with the H branch (I) of the F Company in the fourth floor of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building, and the head of the team in charge of investor attraction and subordinate-class investors management affairs belonging to the branch office; Defendant C, using the aforementioned multi-level sales organization, received each amount of money from the Plaintiff as KRW 10 million on October 12, 2015, KRW 60 million on October 14, 2015, KRW 60 million on December 30, 2015, KRW 30 million on December 30, 2015, KRW 50 million on January 18, 2016, KRW 22 million on February 18, 2016, KRW 17,000 on March 17, 2016.

C. Defendant B in collusion with D, I, etc.

The act of receiving a total of KRW 212,478,00,000 from September 6, 2013 to August 26, 2016 as well as a total of KRW 212,478,00,00 from around September 6, 2013, and Defendant C was above B.

On October 12, 2015, from around August 26, 2016 to around August 26, 2016, Defendant C was prosecuted for violating the Act on the Regulation of Temporary Sales, etc., and the Act on Door-to-Door Sales, Etc. (Seoul Southern District Court 2018Da1902).

The above court has become a similar organization of "multi-level action of the defendants."

arrow