All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment of three years for Defendant A; imprisonment of two years for Defendant B; imprisonment of two years for Defendant C; imprisonment of two years and six months for Defendant D; imprisonment of ten months for 10 months and completion of sexual assault treatment programs at 80 hours for each of 80 hours) is too unreasonable;

2. The Defendants appears to have recognized the defendants' wrong facts, and there are circumstances such as the submission of each agreement from the investigative agency to the court of the trial, and the Defendants were either the first offender or the same criminal records. However, the crime of this case was committed repeatedly against the victims who were in the second degree of mental retardation as they were living in the village of the Defendants, and the nature of the crime was very poor in light of the object, period, method and contents of the crime. The victims agreed with the defendants continuously until the court of the trial, to the effect that "the victims agreed with the defendants due to many other circumstances, but the victim's punishment would be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to have suffered from the sexual identity and values due to the crime of this case, and the defendants' age, character, motive and consequence, etc.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals by the Defendants are without merit, they are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.