beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part of the judgment against the Plaintiff, which orders the payment of the following amounts against Defendant F.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 5, Gap evidence 8 through 10, Gap evidence 20, Gap evidence 28, Gap evidence 30, Gap evidence 36, Gap evidence 37, Gap evidence 40, Gap evidence 41, Gap evidence 45, and Gap evidence 84.
1) The title of the Plaintiff (I Co., Ltd.) was changed to the Plaintiff on June 10, 2010.
(2) Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G have served as the representative director, director, or employee of the Plaintiff, and their specific positions and terms of office are as listed below.
The defendant position B representative director who held office from August 1, 2002 to June 28, 2006, C representative director from June 29, 2006 to May 31, 2009, the D representative director from June 1, 2009 to June 28, 2009 to June 28, 2009 to June 2006 to July 29, 2009 to June 29, 2009 to March 11, 2003 to the F Investment Finance Team employee from April 29 to December 2004 to July 11, 2004 to Defendant JJ (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant JJ”) is the U.S. assets management company (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant JJ”).
(b) Defendant G, a company specialized in asset-backed securitization in the United States (K; hereinafter “K”) around November 2003, who worked for the Plaintiff’s Investment Finance Team for the instant 2003 ABS
) Asset-backed securities (as set-Baked securities) issued on the underlying asset of a life insurance contract in the United States in the United States (hereinafter “instant 2003 ABS”).
As to B, “A proposal to review the purchase of U.S. Life Insurance Cover Claim” with the following contents, and Defendant F, the head of the Investment Finance Team, Defendant E, the director in charge, and Defendant B, the representative director, approved on the said draft.
Accordingly, on December 15, 2003, the Plaintiff “$27,667,046” and “$27,046” refers to the United States currency.
The ABS of this case was purchased.