The defendant shall be innocent.

On November 19, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to three years to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes in the Gwangju District Court on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes, and the judgment was finalized on May 19, 2015.

On March 2, 2007, the Defendant leased the leased apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”) No. 606-dong 1002, Seongdong-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, in terms of ten (10) years of the contract period, and the lease deposit amount of KRW 237,55,000, from a L&C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “WC”).

However, on April 21, 201, the Defendant’s Jinwon rendered a provisional attachment order based on the claim amounting to KRW 240,500,000 against the Defendant of the Credit Guarantee Fund on April 21, 201, and on August 28, 2012, this attachment and collection order was issued.

However, the Defendant, as a public construction rental house, has a preferential right to sell the apartment house after the expiration of the mandatory rental period, and the lessee has the right to sell the apartment house after paying the rent and receiving the ownership of the apartment house. At around around 2013, the Defendant: (a) based on the fact that the premium rate of the right to sell the apartment house was formed around KRW 150 million and KRW 200 million, the Defendant, by concealing the fact that the Defendant’s Jin concealed the fact that the seizure and collection order for the right to return the lease deposit against C&C was issued.

On May 24, 2013, the Defendant, a real estate broker, who introduced the victim F and the victim in E’s real estate located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, as if the Defendant was the owner of the above apartment construction company, was in the same manner as the owner of the above apartment construction company, and received the above apartment from L&C as the substitute.

“The Defendant’s personnel further trust the Defendant’s right to C&C, and the Defendant’s personnel concealed the fact of the seizure and collection order on the leased deposit claim against C&C, and without the Defendant’s consent.