beta
Text
The crime of 1-A, 3-A (1) and 2-1 (1) of the judgment of the defendant, and 3-A (1) of the judgment of the court below).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] On June 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment, additional collection of 281,413,430 won by the Ulsan District Court for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 12, 2016.
[2] Criminal facts D is the person who won the interest of the candidate for the election of the superintendent of the office of education, which was implemented on June 2, 2010, and the defendant is the person who was in charge of accounting at the election campaign office of D related to the fourth degree of interest of D.
1. Violation of the Local Education Autonomy Act related to printing costs, fraud Defendant and D received a contract and a tax invoice from the printing company with respect to printing costs related to E/Si/Gu superintendent election conducted on June 2, 2010, from the printing company, and the said company paid only the printing costs under the actual contract. The E/Si election management commission submitted evidentiary documents, such as false tax invoices, estimates, and contracts, which describe the amount of unrefilled, and conspired to receive reimbursement for election expenses according to the amount of unrefilled money.
(a) In cases of receiving and disbursing election expenses in violation of the Local Education Autonomy Act relating to false entries in evidential documents with the accused and D, such receipts and other evidential documents shall not be falsely entered, forged or altered;
Nevertheless, the Defendant and D found the “H” office operated by G in F on May 2010 and requested the printing of the official gazette, pledge collection, etc. D to the said G, and D prepared the said G as “the actual cost of printing contract shall be KRW 70 million, and related documents, such as tax contract, such as tax contract, etc., shall be written in KRW 110 million, and the remaining money shall be returned to the Defendant, and the consent was obtained from the said G.
According to the above agreement, the Defendant and D received printed materials from the above G around May 2010, while the Defendant supplied the said G at the office of “H” around May 31, 2010, and the Defendant’s amount of KRW 110,000,000, the supply price of KRW 110,000,000, and the tax amount of KRW 11,00,000,00.