A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Defendant, the Defendant,

1. C: 630,000 won and this shall apply.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The past records (main records of crime) habitual fraud (2005): Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and suspended execution for a year (2007): Habitual fraud (2008): imprisonment with prison labor for a year: the last one year and six months: The judgment of fraud which was sentenced on March 31, 2016 by Jeju District Court: the lapse of one year and ten months: the termination of the execution of the sentence of Jeju Prison on March 16, 2017 [criminal]

1. On September 2, 2017, the Defendant in the case of 2018 Godan 443, the Defendant sent a letter of "Ktel 1120, which is the Defendant’s residence in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and the Internet site “Sebber Kinc” to “Seincinc incinc incinc incinc inc incinc inc incinc inc incinc inc incinc inc incinc inc incinc incinc inc incinc inc incin

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant did not have the above portion of oil at that time and received money from the injured party, he did not have the ability to sell the portion of oil, and even if he received money from the injured party for the purpose of receiving money from the injured party as the price for the goods, there was no intention to deliver the said portion of oil.

Nevertheless, on September 2, 2017, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and received KRW 484,00 from the victim to the corporate bank account (M) in the name of the Defendant on or around September 2, 2017, and, from around the above day to February 12, 2018, by deceiving the victims by the above means 78 times in total as shown in the attached list of crimes (443), and by remitting KRW 18,654,80 in total.

2. On July 17, 2017, the Defendant of the instant case, “2018 Godan 675, the Defendant called the victim’s O of the Sungsan-gu Ntel 517, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si,” and “it was difficult for the customer employees to calculate the amount of meals and to calculate the amount of meals, as he/she tried to provide meals to the customer employees, and to provide reimbursement of KRW 300,00,000.

“A false statement,” but in fact, the Defendant did not operate a native store and did not have lost a wall, and there was no special revenue.