logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.13 2017구합1125
재심결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff and D are students who were enrolled in the second year of E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, etc. and were enrolled in the second year of M middle school in 2016 and are currently enrolled in the above middle school in March 2017.

On May 11, 2016, the plaintiff and Dfighting match on April 28, 2016, the plaintiff taken the spons of the f and D in motion pictures and transmitted money to the plaintiff.

On May 25, 2016, at the request of the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence held on May 23, 2016, the head of the Mmiddle School notified the Plaintiff of the following measures on May 25, 2016, upon the request of the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “instant school violence”), to complete five hours of special education under Article 17 (1) 2 of the former Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (Amended by Act No. 15044, Nov. 28, 2017; hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”), including transfer measures under Article 17 (1) 8 of the same Act (hereinafter “the Act on the Prevention of School Violence”).

(hereinafter collectively referred to as "first measure"). (c)

On June 3, 2016, the plaintiff's father B filed a request for a review on the part of the transfer measures among the first measure to the Gyeonggi-do Mediation Committee of Disciplinary Punishment on Students.

Accordingly, the Gyeonggi-do Mediation Committee of Disciplinary Action on Students was decided to revoke the above transfer measures by accepting the above request for reexamination on June 30, 2016.

On July 12, 2016, the head of the Mmiddle School notified the Plaintiff of social service measures under Article 17 (1) 4 of the School Violence Prevention Act and suspension of attendance under Article 17 (1) 6 of the same Act on the premise that the above transfer measures were revoked.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as "second measure"). (e)

D's mother requested a review of the second measure against the defendant on July 19, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted the above request for reexamination on September 29, 2016, and Article 17 (1) 8 of the School Violence Prevention Act in the second measure.

arrow