Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 08:00 on March 29, 2017, the Defendant, at his own house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, caused the Defendant to scape dust, such as shot dust, to shot off into a portable butane gas column. In such cases, after removing the butane gas from the sloping, the Defendant failed to remove it, and caused the dust to flow out by leaving the safety string of the above column into the string, without removing it.

The above negligence by the Defendant, as seen above, led to the above negligence of the Defendant, in order to confirm whether the Defendant was in operation of the road, the said butane gas was explosiond and put into fire on the Defendant’s house, and the fire was transferred to the entire 29 units of the D house attached to the adjoining area, such as the adjoining house.

After all, the defendant, due to negligence, destroyed all the above 29 bonds used by neighboring residents for their residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. On-site reports on results of field identification and on-site photographs;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to portable gas scams);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing portable gas stoves and butane gas photographs;

1. Article 170 (1) and Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. All the buildings of 29 villages with the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which were committed by the defendant, have caused enormous damage to the fire, and the defendant did not reimburse the damage.

However, even though the defendant was not paid, it seems that the Seoul Housing & Urban Corporation had less damage to the damaged people due to providing temporary relocation rental housing to the damaged people, the defendant recognized his mistake and against himself, and agreed with some victims.