Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
A. The status of the attached building among the fourth floor of 134.79 square meters of the building indicated in the attached list is also indicated 1.
Reasons
1. Indication of claim;
A. On June 27, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the condition that the building status of the attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1, among the four-story 134.79 square meters of the building indicated in the attached list, the attached Table 3.69 square meters of the part inside the ship connecting each point in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 (hereinafter “instant studio”) during the period from June 27, 2013 to June 26, 2014 (hereinafter “instant studio”). On June 27, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). On June 27, 2013, the Plaintiff delivered the instant KRW 350,000 (payment on June 27, 2013).
B. Thereafter, around June 3, 2016, the instant lease agreement terminated due to the termination of the Plaintiff’s termination on the grounds of the Defendant’s delay of rent.
C. Nevertheless, the Defendant did not deliver the room of this case to the Plaintiff until now.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the studio of this case to the Plaintiff, and pay to the Plaintiff unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent in proportion to KRW 350,000 per month from June 27, 2016 to June 28, 2016 and from June 28, 2016 to June 350,000.
2. Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;