1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

The grounds alleged by the plaintiffs and the defendant in the court of first instance are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the plaintiffs and the defendant in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance and the defendant are reviewed again together with the allegations by the plaintiffs and the defendant, the judgment of the court of first instance which partially accepted the plaintiffs'

Therefore, this court's reasoning is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the modification of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Revision] Part of the Judgment of the Court of First Instance 4, Part 15, Part 5, and Part 14, respectively, shall be considered as the "Court of First Instance".

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court is the last action "D. inheritance relationship between the network AH, network AI and networkO".

Between Chapter 4, Chapter 7, and Chapter 8 of the judgment of the first instance court, the “Plaintiff” was added to the “Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” on June 10, 2019, after Plaintiff BS died on June 10, 2019, and Plaintiff BS independently succeeded to the networkO (the “Plaintiff” in the attached Table 2 and 3, as to the land subject to expropriation of the networkO on convenience, compensation for losses toO, and additional charges for delay.”

Part 5 through 9 of the judgment of the first instance court are as follows:

In a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation, in case where the appraisal by each appraisal agency and the appraisal by a court has no illegality in the appraisal methods, and there is no illegality in the appraisal methods, and there is no difference in the appraisal results due to the difference in the appraisal results due to the difference in the individual assessment factors, even though the different opinions are different in terms of the remaining price assessment factors except for the individual assessment factors, any one of them shall be the fair compensation values by adopting any one of them, as long as there is no evidence to acknowledge that there is an error in the individual assessment factors.