logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.01.06 2015고정320
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From July 2012 to July 2012, the Defendant is a person who operates a “D private teaching institute” in the Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, Seoyang-gu, 201 and 202, and has worked as a general manager for the management of the above building, and the victim is a person who has worked as a general manager for the management

On December 2, 2013, the Defendant was a full-time member of the management of the above building.

E, even though there is no fact that part of the cost of maintaining a building is individually useful, the maintenance cost shall be deducted in a way that sets the maintenance cost incurred in the management of the building at approximately KRW 20,000 per time, such as setting the cost of maintaining the building at KRW 70,000,000 as a result of this study to determine the cost of maintaining the building at KRW 10,000,000,000 per time, as the title "Public Notice Notice of Building Owners" as the title "(E) of "Public Notice of Building Owners".

The elevator construction work was conducted by taking up KRW 8.5 million in 201, and the former operator removed KRW 20,000 out of KRW 1,50,000 per month the elevator maintenance fee, and it cannot be confirmed that the elevator construction cost has been fully paid.

“A public notice stating false facts to the effect that “,” was prepared and distributed to the lessee and sectional owners of the above building, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement about witness E, F, and G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the substitution of the accused);

1. C Public notice for building owners:

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the illegality is excluded in accordance with Article 310 of the Criminal Act, since the defendant and his defense counsel believe that it is true to return a certain amount of money by fixing excessive expenses for disinfection and remuneration and paying it in the form of return, as stated in its reasoning.

For the justifiable reason that the defendant believe that the victim is taking money, it is compared with the talk of cleaning staff H(the first death of the beginning of 2014) and the victim's position.

arrow