Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000 and by a fine of KRW 500,000, respectively.

Defendant

A above.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2018 High 230" is the actual manager of the Daegu Northern-gu Seoul Northern-gu, who operates a taxi transportation company using 50 full-time workers, and the victim D works as a taxi driver of the above taxi transportation company.

On February 10, 2017, at the office of the taxi company in the Daegu North-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant used the victim's arms at one time after the victim's face was satisfed, pushed in the body of the taxi company in which the victim D(48 tax) and Si expenses were attached, and used the victim's arms at one time after the victim was satisfed.

Defendant B Co., Ltd. is a corporate owner, and around 10:18, Feb. 10, 2017, Defendant B Co., Ltd., who is a corporate manager, committed an assault, at the Defendant’s office located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu, about 10:18, in connection with the Defendant’s business, he saw d’s employees’ ebage, pushed d’s face one time in drinking, and walk d’s face one time in drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F (part);

1. Part concerning D's statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Application of the investigative report (to hear statements from a wooden shot person), investigation report (to be reported) Acts and subordinate statutes related to G;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Articles 107 and 8 of the Labor Standards Act; Selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Articles 115, 107, and 8 of the Labor Standards Act

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A) is that the crime of this case committed by the victim of the victim was committed by assaulting the victim who is forced to bring multiple accusationss, complaints, etc. against the Defendant’s operating company. Thus, the nature of the crime is not good in light of the motive and circumstances of the crime.

In addition, it is consistent with one victim.