Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the defendant corporation B located in Gwangju Northern-gu, and the defendant corporation B is operated by the Deputy Director at the same place.

No business operator who has obtained permission for the installation of wastewater discharge facilities or has filed a report on the installation thereof shall discharge water pollutants from wastewater discharge facilities without flowing them into water pollution prevention facilities (hereinafter referred to as "prevention facilities") or install facilities capable of discharging water pollutants without flowing them into prevention facilities.

1. From October 2012 to April 1, 2015, Defendant A discharged wastewater generated from the above accelerators, Defendant A, instead of preventing the inflow of wastewater preventive facilities, at the entrance of the drainage route connected to the preventive facilities, by setting the bricks or ticks, installed an excellent pipe inside the drainage route to prevent the inflow of wastewater preventive facilities, and thereby allowing Defendant A to discharge wastewater.

As such, the Defendant committed an act of installing facilities to discharge wastewater without flowing it into prevention facilities.

2. A, the representative of Defendant B’s Defendant Company, committed the above-mentioned act in relation to the business of the corporation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written accusation;

1. E statements;

1. A report on installation of wastewater discharge facilities;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 76 subparagraph 3 of Article 76 and Article 38 (1) 1 (Selection of Fines) of the Water Quality and A: Defendant B: Articles 81, 76 subparagraph 3 of the Water Quality and A, and 38 (1) 1 of the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The above facilities have been installed to prevent rainwater from flowing into, or passing over, preventive facilities at each time of the rain of the main points of the allegation, and the lower end of the drainage hole and the excellent pipes.