The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the defendant, despite the fact that the defendant deceivings the victims and defrauds them each of 30 million won, there is an error of misunderstanding of facts.

2. Judgment on the prosecutor's assertion of mistake of facts

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the lower court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

1) From the end of July 2017, E is a business producing and selling a tin photographic flag (hereinafter “instant business”) by investing a total of 30 million won per own, victim B, and one investor, and investing a total of 90 million won to the victim B, who was to produce a tinic flag (hereinafter “the instant business”).

The victim B, upon receipt of these recommendations, discussed that the victim C would participate in the instant project (Evidence No. 212 of the evidence record, No. 9 of the witness E of the court below witness E of the court below, No. 3 of the witness B of the court below, No. 4 of the court below). The defendant, the victim, and the victims expressed that the victim B would have participated in the instant project, and that the defendant would like to re-investment in the instant project in the D plant located within the first patrol officer of the court below on August 2017, and that the defendant would like to explain to the victims the production cost and its profits as stated in the facts charged, i.e., the amount of the photographic flag produced and sold, i.e., the victims, and to maintain the business by re-investment and maintain the remainder.

(6) On the face of the recording of the examination of witness B in the original court witness C, the recording of the examination of witness C in the original court witness C, the recording of the examination of witness C in the party witness C in the court of original instance, the recording of the examination of witness in the party witness C in the court of original instance, and the recording of the examination of witness B in the court of original instance. On the other hand, the defendant concluded a contract to produce 20 copies of the photographici

The written record of the examination of witness D of the court below.