1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 30, 2014, the Plaintiff driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.097% of alcohol level.

B. After that, the Plaintiff, while under the influence of alcohol at around 23:00 on May 25, 2020, driven a B-te motor vehicle at a level of 0.03% of alcohol content, and 500 meters from the front of the D agency located in the wife population C to the front of the F-L station located in E from the day before the agency located in the wife population C.

C. On June 18, 2020, the Defendant issued a disposition revoking the first-class ordinary driver’s license against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff had a driving record under the influence of drinking (hereinafter “instant disposition”). D.

The Plaintiff appealed against the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for administrative appeal on August 18, 2020.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 1 to 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff was able to drive a vehicle from 18:30 on the day to 18:40 to 23:00 after having come to her her friend and her friend and her friend and her friend 4 remaining after having come to her friend and her 23:00 on the day, and her friend her friend her friend her friend her friend her friend her friend her friend her friend her, and the friend her friend her friend her friend her friend her frith her friend her friend her, and the Plaintiff would not drive a friend her friend her friend her.