logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.11.08 2017고단2928
전기통신사업법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2017 Highest 2928]

1. No person who violates the telecommunications business Act shall intermediate a third party's communications through telecommunications services provided by the telecommunications business operator, or provide it for any third party's communications;

However, on January 2017, the Defendant promised to open his own house located in the Gu, Changwon-si, Seoul, to pay the face value by opening the cell phone from a man who was known through the Internet site and paying the face value to him. The Defendant opened three cellular phones in the name of the Defendant and delivered it to the person who was unaware of the name.

2. No person shall lend any access medium with the promise of compensation in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act;

In this regard, the Defendant was proposed to pay KRW 200,000 to the face day of lending the passbook from a person without his name, and consented to it. On February 8, 2017, the Defendant sent the e-mail card connected to the e-mail account under the name of the Defendant on the front day of the Chang-si, Chang-si around 15:00 on February 8, 2017 through Kwikset service articles.

[2017 Highest 3199] The Defendant served as the victim F, victim G, victim H, victim I and J.

On February 16, 2016, the Defendant is required to make an investment at the J Office located in the Guro-gu, Changwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the victim F is required to make an investment.

If the mother lends money, he/she will immediately lend money from his/her mother to repay it.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the debt at the time, since he had to use the debt to repay or gambling the debt, and he did not have any intention or ability to repay the debt at that time.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim F, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the post office account under the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, and received the total sum of KRW 14 million from August 13, 2014 to December 19, 2016, as shown in the annexed crime list, from the victims 14 times in total.

arrow