logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.10.15 2015나1502
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff filed a claim for reimbursement against A by the Seoul Central District Court 2008Gaga3179715 and received a decision of performance recommendation from the above court that "A shall pay to the plaintiff 4,197,545 won and 3,549,112 won a rate of 21% per annum from November 16, 1998 to the date of full payment." The decision was finalized on February 18, 2009.

B. The plaintiff, based on the original copy of the decision of performance recommendation with the above executory power, requested a collection order for the debtor A and the third debtor as the principal and interest of KRW 10,564,360, and the Suwon District Court 2007TT-5570 with the above interest, and the above court on June 4, 2007: "The above court served the defendant with a collection order for the above amount after deducting the tax and public charges from the salary received every month from the defendant (the principal salary and salary) and the end allowances received in June and December of each year (the closing allowances) which were received in June and December of each year, until it reaches the above amount (Provided, That in cases falling under the amount prescribed by the Enforcement Decree of the Civil Execution Act in consideration of the minimum cost of living under the National Basic Living Security Act, if it falls under the amount prescribed by the Enforcement Decree of the Civil Execution Act in consideration of the remaining amount, and the living expenses of the standard household, the remaining amount excluding them) and the collection order until 1/200 of the retirement allowance."

C. On May 28, 2005, A entered into a standard labor contract with the Defendant to provide services on a site basis, with a basic salary of KRW 500,000, but at the time of on-site service, A retired from office on August 13, 2010 after having entered into a standard labor contract with the Defendant to receive on-site service allowances and all statutory allowances under the Labor Standards Act.

In this case.

arrow