1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts: (a) the part concerning “A” of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b)

【Supplementary Use】

B. Determination 1) According to each of the evidence evidence Nos. 5, 9, and 11, it is reasonable to view that Defendant I was registered as L’s auditor from March 20, 2013 to April 6, 2015, and Defendant F, H, I, and J held part of L’s shares. However, in full view of the above evidence and evidence Nos. 11 to 14, 11 to 32 as well as the overall purport of the arguments and arguments, it appears that Defendant I’s audit status is formally formal. The Defendants are employees of L’s order to offer work under the employer’s direction and supervision, and the Defendants owned the same wage claim as the amount acknowledged in the above payment order as L’s wage payment order. The Plaintiffs did not have any reason to accept the Defendants’ claim against the Defendants, including the lack of evidence Nos. 11 to 12, 13, and 32, and there was no reason to view that the Defendants were not in compliance with the aforementioned evidence No. 5.

The name, period of service, salary, and overdue period.